I don't think it's the alternative. I think it is the current reality, that no one wants to admit.
-- Tim Heald [EMAIL PROTECTED] 703-300-3911 -----Original Message----- From: Robert Munn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, March 12, 2006 11:56 PM To: CF-Community Subject: Re: Foolhardy US Posturing on Iran by Bolton I never had any illusions about Iraq being a cheap war, but then again I never thought we were going in over WMD either. I figured it was all about changing the face of the Middle East. And again, I'm not suggesting any kind of invasion. That would be a total failure. As I said before, I don't even know if it would be possible (and Tim's thoughts about the current troop deployments pretty much tell me it isn't), but the alternative is, as Tim said, a world war. On 3/12/06, Larry C. Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > You mean just like the fantasy that the Iraqi invasion would pay for > itself and that the entire population would welcome the US forces. It > would be worse than what currently is happening in iraq. > > Don't know what you're smoking but I'd cut back on it. > > On 3 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:199707 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
