Are you suggesting that couples with a marriage certificate, but no
children are not married?

On 3/13/06, Nick McClure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't think somebody should be able to drive in an unsafe way. I'm using
> that as a general example. Yes your life is more important than my desire to
> drive like a maniac. However there is something that we use to weigh those
> two rights.
>
> Life is not fair, however we believe it wrong to allow me to drive in a way
> that dangers others. Those are morals, sacrificing ones wants for what is
> right.
>
> To me marriage isn't directly about love, love is there without marriage and
> marriage can be there without love. Marriage can be there without laws.
>
> However, my problem with gay marriage has to do with children. I think
> marriage should be based on family, and the desire for children.
>
> I realize there are other economical things that surround gay marriage that
> people should be entitled to, and I think there should be a way to deal with
> that. I'm not sure the term marriage is the way to go. But without a
> solution that doesn't create a new separate but equal problem I don't know
> what to do.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Robert Everland III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > Are you seriously asking this question? Why should someone's right to live
> > supersede someone's right to live? The idea of laws is to protect the
> > citizens, from faud, from death, from other governments. I would like to
> > know why you think someone should be allowed to drive unsafely if there is
> > a good chance it could end someone's life. You have the right to do
> > anything you want as long as you don't interfere with my rights.
> >
> > Some may "think" that it harms them, just like some people thought that
> > integration would hurt them. It's an untruth based on feelings rather then
> > a fact based upon research. They can act on it all they want, but I think
> > it should be up to those with an open mind to realize that we are no
> > better than any of those countries we are occupying that oppress part of
> > their civilization. You may not want to admit it, but we are oppressing
> > part of our population who want nothing more than to express their love
> > for their mate like the rest of the population can do at any time.
> >
> >
>
>
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:199801
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to