That might be largely nurture... The more older brothers you have as a
child, the more you are going to be nurtured by your older brothers.
You look up to them, and it's not outside the realm of reason that
simply looking up to your older brothers helps to foster a kind of
glorification of men in your mind as a young child which might then
translate into sexual attraction as you get older.

The fact that a few, dozens, or even hundreds of families in which
there are 10+ boys and none of them turn out to be gay of course
doesn't disprove the statistic. The statistic doesn't say "if you have
10 boys, the 10th is gonna be gay". The statistic says a 10th boy is
_more_likely_ to be gay than a 10th child in a family with fewer boys.
So in a sample of 1,000 families, you may find that amongst families
with 2 boys, 1% of the youngest boys turns out to be gay, whereas in
families with 6-8 boys, 1.5-2% of the youngest boys turns out to be
gay. Even at 2% that is a noticeable increase in likelyhood, and still
leaves 980 families in the sample with potentially no gay children
compared to only 20 whose youngest boy is gay.

Why do people not understand likelyhoods? Everybody thinks that if you
make a comment about statistics that just because they've seen the
oposite happen a few times the statistic is invalid.

> I didn't see that part, but that doesn't make any sense at
> all. I've
> seen only child boys, and families with 10 bots and none
> gay.

> I don't think anybody has a clue what makes one person
> gay, anymore than
> we can understand the emotions behind love.

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Gruss Gott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 10:59 PM
>> To: CF-Community
>> Subject: Re: Being Gay: Nature or Nurture?
>>
>> The 60 minutes link that I posted gave this interesting
>> fact: the more
>> older brothers a boy has, the higher the probability he
>> has of being
>> Gay.
>>
>> So, evolution may have found a way of controlling the
>> population - and
>> it may be in all mammals.


s. isaac dealey     434.293.6201
new epoch : isn't it time for a change?

add features without fixtures with
the onTap open source framework

http://www.fusiontap.com
http://coldfusion.sys-con.com/author/4806Dealey.htm


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:200000
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to