That's why I put it in stars. They have been accused strongly on many occasions to be lax in their reviews and allowing things to slip by but there is no concrete evidence that they're letting things go. Accusations and circumstantial evidence is not enough to say they're standard corrupt UN puppets but....
If you want, I can post some of the accusations and later history on them. > "*known* to 'fudge' the facts" > > that's a fairly strong statement Michael, care to support that with > real data and not polemics. > > On 3/17/06, Michael Dinowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Given that the IAEA is UN and has been *known* to 'fudge' the facts and >> not >> investigate as well as it should, I'd rather trust neither. >> >> > The final report issued by the IAEA was quite unequivocal, they said >> > no WMD's. Given the shrubbery's pervarication, I'd rather trust the >> > IAEA. >> > >> > On 3/17/06, Nick McClure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> But those guys weren't given complete access, and they did report it >> >> seemed >> >> Iraq was hiding or being less than cooperative. >> >> >> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:200452 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
