>I would have to disagree. This is EXACTLY what science does. > > It takes an observed event (we will leave aside the credibility of the > event) and tries to find an explanation. It then tries to predict > future behaviors and repeat it. >
Well, you make a pretty good point. I guess science can posit some possible explanations based upon whatever corporeal evidence they are able to present. I've re-read the actual passages from the Bible that talk about this particular miracle though, and an ice theory wouldn't really explain the events as written....so I just can't shake this sneaking suspicion that science is barking up a tree that it can't possibly climb. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:203167 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
