> Gel wrote: > But this article would have you believe that we never will have that > technology. >
No. This article would have you believe that it's *cheaper* to develop high efficiency petrol engines that it is to develop kick-ass solar cells. However, even though you're still missing the point, I'll help you with your argument: "But in the long run kick ass solar cell powered tractors can harvest switch grass for autos, and that's WAY cheaper." True. Which brings us to the second point of the article: probability. Petrol engines and fuel distributions already exist. Tweaking them for efficiency is WAY easier than developing whole new technologies. Therefore the probablility is that more investors will be comfortable with tweaking known technologies than inventing new unproven ones. But, if you want to invest your money, do it! You could become a bazillionaire! ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:206457 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
