let's leave Michael Moore out of this. What exactly did this bit of film say that was in any way untruthful?
I am just waiting for somoene to tell me I just dislike the man, and that's why I am saying this ;) By the way I posted the original journalism behind all this to this very list about a year ago. Most people said ho hum. And reminded me that Clinton got a blow job ;) To be fair, I don't think you were one of those people. The only thing I recall that is clearly partisan or questionable however, is the attribution of heroic motives to the Travis County prosecutor. I actually don't think they are what the admin lip synchers say they are, but I don't know that they are heroic either. On the other hand it just gets really old when the reaction to the most serious of charges is always some sort of adjective, whether "wacko" or "partisan" or whatever. Dana >I think there is a difference between a news clip and a documentary >that is clearly editorial in nature. Was Moore's 9/11 a "news clip"? > >-Cameron > >On 5/15/06, Dana Tierney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:206788 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
