> Cam wrote: > I was just stating that it looks like it's being marketed > as an editorial documentary and not as a "news program". >
I agree with you that it's definitely taking selective media clips to make a point - just look at the title. Obviously it's going to show clips that supports it's view and ignore facts that don't. I agree with Dana that it's not making anything up, just showing what's happened (albeit in a slanted way). I disagree with you regarding it's marketing. The title tells you right off that the producers feel Delay "stole" congress and they're going to prove it. This should be a viewers first tip that she's about to see the prosecution's case and not the defense. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:206794 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
