do we really need to go over the technical issues of presidential elections again? if you don't like the electoral college, propose an amendment to the constitution.
it is you who is seriously deluded. the only question the supreme court addressed was the due process issue of Katherine Harris certifying the election, v. having Gore's challenge for a selective recount enforced. Had the Supreme Court voted otherwise, Gore would still have lost the selective recount- according to the study done by the New York Times, et. al. after the fact. According to the same study, the only way Gore could have won on a recount would have been to ask for a statewide recount, not a selective recount. It is ironic because the Gore camp believed a statewide recount would not have been in their favor, while a selective recount would have given them the election. But since he never asked for a statewide recount, that issue is totally moot. So stop crying about it and move on - dot org! On 6/12/06, Maureen wrote: > > Bush wasn't elected BY THE PEOPLE. He lost the popular vote, and > would have lost the electoral vote without Supreme Court intervention > and if you think differently, you are seriously deluded. And if > someone will point out factual instances of Moore lying, as opposed to > simply putting a different spin on an event, I'll be happy to revise > my opinion. > > -- --------------- Robert Munn www.funkymojo.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:208851 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
