oh please. As to your first paragraph, see my previous post. As to your second... I am surprised you can say that with a straight face. Gitmo as some sort of tough love? Get real.
>+1 that is way, way over the line Dana. > >Do we grind up their bones and use it for soap, I suppose? Do we starve them >half to death and then gas them? Do we cart them off in cattle cars for mass >extermination? No. We give them clean living conditions, three square meals, >religious materials. What we don't give them is freedom, because they are >f^&*ing terrorists. They are all lucky we are not barbarians like the >Taliban regime they were defending or it would have been two in the back of >the head and leave the bodies for the carrion feeders. We would have never >had to worry about Gitmo because they would have all been dead as fried >chicken. > >But we do worry about Gitmo, and we worry about how these scumbags are >treated, because we are a far better nation than you ever seem to want to >acknowledge. A lot of the thugs still in Gitmo are there because if we >deport them back where they came from they will be imprisoned, tortured, and >maybe executed. So we endure the slings and arrows of outrageous world >opinion rather than take the easy way out and send these murderers back home >to face their fate. > > > >On 6/12/06, deadcityskin wrote: > >-- >--------------- >Robert Munn >www.funkymojo.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:209203 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
