I thought that was Geneva Convention stuff. Enemy prisoners don't get released until the fighting is over.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Dana Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 2:32 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: So, does anyone still trust these guys? > > US law forbids sending them back? References, please. Where they will be > executed? Specifics? So let's see, you are saying that under US law it is > ok to detain someone indefinitely but it's not ok to release him if he > might be in danger? That just does not make sense. > > >On 6/14/06, Dana wrote: > >> > >> oh please. As to your first paragraph, see my previous post. As to your > >> second... I am surprised you can say that with a straight face. Gitmo > as > >> some sort of tough love? > >> Get real. > > > > > >Once again you fail to understand the plain meaning of words. Gitmo has > >nothing to do with tough love. We have a bunch of Scumbags locked up. We > >don't know what to do with them, because mostly U.S. law prohibits them > >being sent back to where they came from. What do you propose we do with > >them? Oh right, you don't propose anything, you just complain. > > > >I'm all for leaving them in Gitmo to rot or giving them the option of > facing > >trial in Afghanistan, where they will almost surely be convicted and > >executed. Any takers? > >-- > >--------------- > >Robert Munn > >www.funkymojo.com > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:209242 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
