> Dana wrote: > and that's true, but consider that we have only the word of this > administration,
While agree with you about GitMo, I don't think we can blame Mr. Bush or this administration. The fact that GitMo exists is not a partisan issue. Mr Bush has said numerous times that he believes it needs to be shut down. He agrees with you! (Hopefully I have credibility when it comes to defending Mr. Bush :) Al Quaeda attacked the US and it's sympathizers had overtook Afghanistan as well as many other governments. Al Quaeda and its cohorts are responsible for the heightened need for security and for the current occupations/security actions taking place around the world. GitMo is a must have facility. Period. And, unfortunately, there's probably some people there who needn't be. However, there's a lot of people that DO need to be there and we can't forget that. Where we can blame Mr. Bush is not working with Congress to come up a third policy solution for this quasi-war/police issue. The World needs to agree on rights and rules when it comes to situations like this. If we were doing that, GitMo would be a non-issue because the world would see efforts and progress. So if we're looking to solve the root cause, it's that policies don't exist to address this in-between martial threat - not that GitMo exists. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:210654 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
