That's what we're talking about. You attribute that thinking to me but I was just explaining the ramifications of GG's statement. It was not my position. My position is our enemies can now ignore the GC while still having full protection from it. That has nothing to do with our constitution applying to every person on the planet.
On 7/5/06, Dana Tierney wrote: > ? that's me mocking you, Sam. Did you really think that I myself think that? > Wow. > > > > relax Nick, its a patented Sam straw man. People in Guantanamo > > deserve hearings, therefore our soldiers can't use their guns. > > Ridiculous. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:210664 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
