I never heard of him until his NYT piece. Which one don't you believe? 1. He said his wife had nothing to do with his appointment. 2. He said he based his decision on the forgeries, yet they weren't available until 8 months later. 3. He said his report debunked the Niger story, meanwhile the CIA considered his report more of a confirmation.
On 7/13/06, Dana Tierney wrote: > what a lot of people you call liars. Your theory just doesn't make sense to > me. What did he get out of it after all? I just don't believe it. What does > the administration get out of discrediting him? A nice red herring, a > rebuttal of his public statements, a chance to change the subject... ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:5/messageid:211122 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
