see but... his proposal didn't give anyone control over their own money really. Basically the idea was that rather than having a savings account with the government, you would have an investment account with the government, but would be limited as to what you could invest in.
So, coming from an administration with this track record, can we assume that campaign donors would figure heavily on the list? That Enron, in fact, would probably be there if it had not already gone bust? I am all in favor of people keeping control of their money. I just don't think that the proposal did that, once you got past the feel-good buzzwords, any more than the tax cut helped small businesses or No Child Left Behind improved education. And I am rather disappointed that you seem to buy into the proposal that one would only even criticize Bush because one has a personal hate for the man. >giving you more control over your own money is a good idea, even if Satan >himself proposed it! (which i think some of you believe he did). ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:5/messageid:211338 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
