well Sam, in my world it is possible to be a reputable newspaper despite occasionally criticizing Israel's positions.
On 8/15/06, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was responding to your claiming they're a reputable paper. I never > tried to tie anti-Israel reporting to anti-Jewish reader comments. > That was a just a coincidence. > > On 8/15/06, Dana wrote: > > Alright well... here is what I see. A group that feels that Israel is much > > maligned. More power to them, but frankly I don't care enough to wade > > through and verify chapter and verse. If they think it's an organized > > campaign every time someone disagrees with Israel, well, their work is cut > > out for them is all I can say. None of this makes the Guardian anti-Jewish > > though. > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:213254 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
