I'm right with you Cameron on thinking one is scientific and one is religious doctrine. However, if you're coming from their side, they believe what we take for fact is just a bunch of hooey. So what's the solution? Do we keep insisting "Our side is fact!" and alienating the religious right until they have large enough numbers to overthrow our view and replace it with they theory only?
On 8/22/06, Cameron Childress <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 8/22/06, Zaphod Beeblebrox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The religion needs to be a required class alongside of science. I > > wholeheartedly believe that creationism is bunk, but I can't disprove > > it and I can't tell a christian that they must learn my way only.... > > Reading between the lines a bit... You are arguing that they should > be taught along side each other because they are competing theories. > They aren't. One is a scientific theory, one is religious doctrine. > > I really think most humanities should be electives in the "pick two of > the following 10 classes" kinda way. I'm not really sure "teach it > simply because we can't disprove it" is a good test for required > classes. > > -Cameron > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:213885 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
