> Matt wrote: > And therein lies the problem - your preconcieved notion that it's wrong, > without having actually studied it.
What predictive framework does ID use? Has that predictive framework seen empirical verification or does it have a basis in proven empirically proven frameworks such as calculus? No. Therefore there is not missed notion. There is no predictive framework and therefore it's mythology that uses scientific terminology. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:214010 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
