Thanks be to god the voice of reason speaks. > -----Original Message----- > From: Larry Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006 11:43 AM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: Loose Change > > > >ok well... what this movie says is that the building was in fact > >designed to withstand being hit by a plane, and that jet fuel does not > >burn hot enough to achieve those results. See the movie for more > >detail. I am not going to argue its merits either pro or con. > > > >On 8/22/06, Ian Skinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > > Simply put you're wrong. I don't have the references here, but > both the National Institute for Standards and Technologies and > the National Academy of Sciences: Engineering published very > detail reports on the WTC collapse. I'll provide the links later > but the reports do debunk this. > > Remember the aircraft were full of aviation jet fuel going into > the building at several hundred miles per hour. Remembering basic > phyics, force = mass X accelleration, means that there was a hell > of a lot of energy released when the impact occurred. No > conspiracy needed. The simplest explanation, as usual is the most > likely one. > >
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:214055 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
