I'm trying to reserve judgement on this thing until I see it.....IF i ever do.
I think everyone knows that Clinton's administration dropped the ball in dealing with the terrorist threat throughout the 90's. If this film exaggerates that, or focuses solely on that fact, then it should be labelled what it is: a conservative fluff piece. If it's factual, and deals with the whole scope of failings that contributed to 9/11, many of which occurred during a democratic presidency, then i'm fine with it. If even one part of it is made up bullshit (ala Fahrenheit), like these Senators claim, then I want it blasted to bits. Oh, and if the GOP tried this, I'd say the exact same thing. On 9/8/06, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What if the GOP tried this? > > http://democrats.senate.gov/newsroom/record.cfm?id=262624&; > > .... > Presenting such deeply flawed and factually inaccurate misinformation > to the American public and to children would be a gross miscarriage of > your corporate and civic responsibility to the law, to your > shareholders, and to the nation. > > The Communications Act of 1934 provides your network with a free > broadcast license predicated on the fundamental understanding of your > principle obligation to act as a trustee of the public airwaves in > serving the public interest. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:215043 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
