What time frame since the late 60's has terrorism not been an issue? Let's not forget The Israei Olympic team, the SLA, the weathermen, Barracks in Beriut, Air India plane, Achille Laurel, The USS Cole, numerous embassy assualts, Oklahoma City etc...
It appears to me that regardless of effort we have had roughly the same amount of terrorism in each of the last 3 or 4 decades. Actually, since 9/11 and Bushes subsequent invasion of Iraq I would say that international terrorism is up (Phillipines, Bali, London, Spain, Iraq, Chechneya, Afghanistan ...) Apparently the war on terrorism hasn't been anymore succesful than the war on drugs. I wasn't a big fan of Clinton, but I don't see how he is anymore responsible for 9/11 or terrorism than the current administration. Afterall, 9/11 happened nearly 9 months after Bush took office. It's not like it happened two weeks after he took office. >On 9/8/06, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> I hear this a lot and I don't agree. He certainly didn't go after >> terrorists as much as we now know he should have, but I didn't see >> terrorism as a big threat then and I'd guess he didn't either. > > >Ah, really? > >The '93 WTC bombing, the Taliban revolution in '96 complete with terrorist >training facilities, the embassy bombings in Africa....which of these events >most convinced you in the 90's that terrorism "was no big threat"? > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:215051 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
