Doesn't this look like a threat? The Communications Act of 1934 provides your network with a free broadcast license predicated on the fundamental understanding of your principle obligation to act as a trustee of the public airwaves in serving the public interest.
Plus, Bill Clinton called them personaly and told them to change it or not show it. On 9/8/06, Ian Skinner wrote: > What if the GOP tried this? > > http://democrats.senate.gov/newsroom/record.cfm?id=262624&; > > > What Censorship? > > Where did it say that that any action would be taken to prevent this from > being aired if it was chosen to be? The letter presented an argument why the > Dems feel the program is very biased? The have just as much right to express > their opinions as the parties on the other side don't they? > > No if this letter had threatened legal or legislative action to try and force > the issue, I would have a problem with that from any side, but this letter > didn't even call for a boycott. I feel it concisely expressed one side's > opinion and why they feel this program is not in the best interest of the > public the way it is being portrayed. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:215046 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
