Your analogies can rarely be applied to topic at hand. My response needs to be as absurd. If it served milk would it still be called a water fountain? Why can't the milk and juice fountain be called a water fountain also?
On 9/25/06, Gruss Gott wrote: > > Sam wrote: > > I also support the right of people to recognize the definition > > of marriage as a union between a man and a woman. > > > > What useful purpose would such a discriminatory definition serve? Put > another way, isn't that same thing as supporting the defintion of > "white" waterfountains vs. "black" waterfountains? > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:215974 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
