> gMoney wrote: > No he's not. Unless he's said our troops in Iraq are direclty leading to a > decrease in terrorism. If he's said that, i'll jump on your "he's lying > again!" bandwagon. >
This lie is same way that 90% of Americans thought that Iraq was directly tied to 9/11. How did Americans get that idea when Bush himself has just admitted that Iraq was in no way tied to 9/11? Because of his implicit lie. I guess I find it almost disingenuous that anyone would say that calling Iraq "central to the war on terror" doesn't clearly and directly MEAN that our presence in Iraq in necessary to defeat terrorism. It's not, and the President's own people are telling him it's making it worse. Isn't that distinction you're making like the debate on the meaning of "is". ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:216047 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
