> Matt wrote: > Movies, TV, the point's still the same. You're making an assumption, just > like Skorp did.
The question is, what kind of person would give their kid permission to go to a museum but: A.) Be totally ignorant of what is actually at a museum, and B.) Find out that their kid saw a naked person statue at the museum? The answer is obvious: some Christian ignoramus. The conclusion is elementary as deduced from the facts. The only thing left is for you to prove me wrong by revealing a different outcome. And even if that were true, which it isn't, it would be contradictory from the facts. So Skorp's conclusion is a fair one. Sure, there's a non-negligible probability that he's wrong, but he's most probably correct. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:216264 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
