> cHat wrote: > 1. Nobody said it was a nude female body that the students saw.
I was just guessing. Boobs always get everyone all worked up. > 2. When you characterize the actions of a community as "nutty" and > place religous connontations on their actions it insinuates a tendancy > of the accusor to be biased against that religon. Point taken and my apologies. Correlation does not equal causation was my intended implicit point, but it was poorly made. > 3. Every parent regardless of religous background or ethnicity has the > right to complain if they don't agree with something their child is > exposed to regardless of where that exposure happens. Sure, but most of us know that museums have nude art but then I haven't been to an American museum in decades. Maybe all the nudie stuff has been banned by the Supreme Court by now. > 4. According to Wikipedia: "There is a large Protestant influence on > the Dallas community. Ah ha! I wrote my last post before I read this. And I didn't even read the article, I was just interested in the logic. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:216269 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
