Isn't that also what is required by the Geneva Convention. ________________________________
From: Jeff Garza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sat 10/14/2006 11:05 AM To: CF-Community Subject: RE: Republicans Suspend Habeas Corpus Where in that bill did it indicate that the military could hold people indefinately? I must have missed that one. The bill gave the authority to the military to convene military tribunals for non-citizen enemy combatants. Sounds to me like they are saying that these people will get trials though the military justice system. When laws are broken inside the country, then trials at the state/federal level take place. This is true for both citizens and non-citizens. When the rules of war are broken, they are handled by military tribunal. And now military tribunals are authorized to handle enemy combatants. Your provacative language here really cracks me up Gruss. I think that is by far the funniest part of your posts in general. Here are some rules of thumb for you to take home... 1) When in a foreign country, best not to try and raise arms against our deployed troops in the region when not your not part of a recognized uniformed fighting force (this makes you an enemy combatant). 2) When you are a non-citizen guest in this country, try obeying our laws. It's just a nice thing to do. 3) Understand that another's power to dominate you is mostly out of your control, especially if she's really cute. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:217505 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
