> The question is, what evidence did they have that _proved_ he was guilty.
And what about his lawyer? City/County/State provided? I've seen some pretty piss-poor excuses for public defenders. What about the DNA evidence was not available 18 years ago? There apparently _was_ evidence, so was it a case of not being able to analyze it at all, not being able to analyze it thoroughly enough to exonerate, or was DNA evidence not yet admissable in the court system at the time? -- will "If my life weren't funny, it would just be true; and that would just be unacceptable." - Carrie Fisher ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7 Experience Flex 2 & MX7 integration & create powerful cross-platform RIAs http:http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;56760587;14748456;a?http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=LVNU Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:225705 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
