so why is it called civic duty if a juror is not acting as a representative of the city? Plus, how many more people would find ways to get out of jury duty if you were held financially accountable for verdicts?
On 1/25/07, Nick McClure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Based on what we've read, he wasn't framed, or setup. the evidence pointed > to him and he was found guilty. The city didn't imprison him, the jury did > that, I don't think you can hold the city accountable in this case unless > they willfully sought to keep the DNA evidence out. > > If he wants to sue, sue the jury. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Robert Munn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 12:04 PM > > To: CF-Community > > Subject: Re: Man seeking payment for "wrongful imprisonment" > > > > He was convicted justly? No he wasn't. He was convicted injustly! > > That's the > > whole point. I say he should have sued for more. > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7 Experience Flex 2 & MX7 integration & create powerful cross-platform RIAs http:http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;56760587;14748456;a?http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=LVNU Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:225740 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
