We do not yet know the evidence that was used to convict him. If the police did not follow up on the previous rape (remember when that used to happen a lot - that police thought rape was the woman's fault?), and it can be proved they acted in bad faith, then I think he may have a case.
And if they exagerated evidence, or overlooked obvious evidence, then it should be looked at. But, as the article pointed out, no one has the right to a perfect investigation. I like the state compensation program. I think the amount is about right, even. We'll have to wait and see how this comes out. I'll follow it. On 1/25/07, Nick McClure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Based on what we've read, he wasn't framed, or setup. the evidence pointed > to him and he was found guilty. The city didn't imprison him, the jury did > that, I don't think you can hold the city accountable in this case unless > they willfully sought to keep the DNA evidence out. > > If he wants to sue, sue the jury. > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7 Experience Flex 2 & MX7 integration & create powerful cross-platform RIAs http:http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;56760587;14748456;a?http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=LVNU Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:225724 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
