That there is the telling thought: Penalty.
I dont see it as a penalty, but as a price of doing business. More business. With better profit margins. And higher returns. Is it totally fair? Not if you look at it on a personal, selfish basis. Is it fair, if you look on it from a "who can affored a little more without eating dogfood or losing their house.", then it is a little more fair. If you look at it from the ancient concept of "*noblesse* *oblige", then it is not only fair, but right. If I was emperor of the world, I would probably institute a flat tax, at 10% to start, and make it apply to every penny everyone makes, regardless of salary range. For me, that would be fair. * On 2/6/07, G Money <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Maybe we can look at this another way. Even if Gruss was still motivated > enough to take on great personal risk and achieve greater financial > success....where is the fairness in INCREASING his penalty for doing > so....especially if the reason is to give more money to the fat dorito > eater? > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7 Experience Flex 2 & MX7 integration & create powerful cross-platform RIAs http:http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;56760587;14748456;a?http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=LVNU Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:226965 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
