I agree

On 2/6/07, Jerry Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> That there is the telling thought:
>
> Penalty.
>
> I dont see it as a penalty, but as a price of doing business. More
> business.
> With better profit margins. And higher returns.
>
> Is it totally fair? Not if you look at it on a personal, selfish basis.
> Is it fair, if you look on it from a "who can affored a little more
> without
> eating dogfood or losing their house.", then it is a little more fair.
> If you look at it from the ancient concept of "*noblesse* *oblige", then
> it
> is not only fair, but right.
>
> If I was emperor of the world, I would probably institute a flat tax, at
> 10%
> to start, and make it apply to every penny everyone makes, regardless of
> salary range.
>
> For me, that would be fair.
> *
> On 2/6/07, G Money <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Maybe we can look at this another way. Even if Gruss was still motivated
> > enough to take on great personal risk and achieve greater financial
> > success....where is the fairness in INCREASING his penalty for doing
> > so....especially if the reason is to give more money to the fat dorito
> > eater?
> >
>
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7 
Experience Flex 2 & MX7 integration & create powerful cross-platform RIAs 
http:http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;56760587;14748456;a?http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=LVNU

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:226966
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5

Reply via email to