> He said there's no evidence we're capable. He's not saying that we > are > not capable.
And I still say it's a dumb statement. There's no evidence that something like a large atomic explosion for instance would not effect climate?? In any case, the argument that there's no definitive proof about us causing global warming is a poor one, IMO. It's near impossible to reach that level of "proof" about a system over which we cannot remove all other effects, so to demand it is simply unreasonable. It's not a closed scientific system which is what is needed to provide "proof". We can just do our best to draw conclusions that are best supported by the facts as we can determine them...and the vast majority of scientists do feel that it supports the theory that we are a major contributing factor. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7 Experience Flex 2 & MX7 integration & create powerful cross-platform RIAs http:http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;56760587;14748456;a?http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=LVNU Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:227050 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
