I'm saying that abuse of the signing statement seems to me to be a symprom of arrogance.
I have no idea whether this is what Lincoln did, but based on your track record I am inclined to doubt it. Quit trying to change the subject and stick to the guy who is in power now. If Congress passes a law should he be able to just nullify it by fiat? Dana On 2/9/07, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So you're saying it is OK for some Presidents to use it but not for > Bush because you don't like or trust him. Got it. > > Does that mean Lincoln freeing the slaves was legal? Maybe? > > > On 2/9/07, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Clinton did not have the signing statement down to the art form that Bush > > does. > > And that is just one of many manifestations of this administration's > > arrogance. My favorite is the "we can lock you up and never have to > > say why" thing. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7 Experience Flex 2 & MX7 integration & create powerful cross-platform RIAs http:http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;56760587;14748456;a?http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=LVNU Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:227614 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
