? Is this link supposed to prove the legality of signing statements according to you? Did you read it?
``This shows that the Supreme Court is alert to this dispute -- that the Supreme Court reads the newspapers," Fein said." Incidentally a reference in a dissenting opinion, even at the supreme court level, does not constitute case law. But seriously dude.... I am previewing some distance education software for the reading lab... want me to see if I can get you an account? On 2/10/07, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I already posted this but you ignored it. > Go on and tell me how biased this guy is :) > > http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2006/07/15/scalias_dissent_gives_signing_statements_more_heft/ > > Scalia's dissent gives 'signing statements' more heft > By Charlie Savage, Globe Staff | July 15, 2006 > > > On 2/9/07, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Couldn't find an unbiased source could ya. > > :) > > nice spin though > > ta > > Dana > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7 Experience Flex 2 & MX7 integration & create powerful cross-platform RIAs http:http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;56760587;14748456;a?http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=LVNU Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:227660 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
