And not so proud as to try and exploit the issue. larry
-- Larry C. Lyons ColdFusion/Web Developer Certified Advanced ColdFusion 5 Developer EBStor.com 8870 Rixlew Lane, Suite 204 Manassas, Virginia 20109-3795 tel: (703) 393-7930 fax: (703) 393-2659 Web: http://www.ebstor.com http://www.pacel.com email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Chaos, panic, and disorder - my work here is done. -- > -----Original Message----- > From: Russel Madere [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 2:21 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: RE: How to lie your way into the White House - Bush-style > > > Actually Beth, I think Michael's comment was about Paula > Jones, not Monica. > > Paula was not proud to have been harrassed by then Gov > Clinton, she was > quite hurt by it. She never had a cum stain from him, let > alone keep one. > > Russel > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: BethF [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 1:16 PM > > To: CF-Community > > Subject: Re: How to lie your way into the White House - Bush-style > > > > > > Actually, from my point of view, I think that was propaganda > > because all the > > evidence points to a consensual relationship. She kept his > cum stains > > because she was proud of having the relationship with him. > > > > --Beth, Pseudo usenet cop > > Merlin MTB, BikeE AT, RANS gliss, Trek R200, Kickbike > > Owned by Kavik (Samoyed Boy) and Toklat (Keeshond Boy) > > Anchorage, Alaska > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Michael Corrigan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 10:07 AM > > Subject: Re: How to lie your way into the White House - Bush-style > > > > > > > Don't forget why he was being investigated. A woman > accused him of > > > sexual harassment. The very nature of the alleged crime > was sexual in > > > nature so the questions in the investigation had to > revolve around his > > > sexual activity (duh). The apologists for Clinton always > spin it to > > > make it sound that he was being investigated for messing > around with > > > Monica and that it was two consenting adults. According > to Paula Jones, > > > she did not consent when Clinton put the moves on her. > That's where it > > > all began. He lied in the beginning and when they conducted their > > > investigation found discrepancies in his testimony. Now > they had to go > > > back a revisit the issue and figure out who's telling the > truth, and on > > > and on it went. It was not about sex, it was about a > crime that was > > > allegedly committed by one person on another. You may > not believe Paula > > > Jones, but I doubt one person on this list would disagree > that it should > > > not have been investigated. The investigation regarding > that case kept > > > ballooning because he kept lying and getting caught in > the process. > > > > > > BTW: Not directed at you Marcus. Your e-mail just > happened to be the one > > > I responded to. This was a general response to those who > maintain that > > > it was sex between two consenting adults when it wasn't. > > > > > > Michael Corrigan > > > Programmer > > > Endora Digital Solutions > > > 1900 Highland Avenue, Suite 200 > > > Lombard, IL 60148 > > > 630-627-5055 ext.-136 > > > 630/627-5255 Fax > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: Marcus > > > To: CF-Community > > > Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 12:46 PM > > > Subject: RE: How to lie your way into the White House - > Bush-style > > > > > > > > > > If its a law thats antiquated and not enforced, then > yes it does. > > > > Have you > > > > seen that list of ridiculous laws that circulates the > internet? If > > > I got > > > > arrested for one of those laws then most certainly, I > would say I > > > had been > > > > wronged. > > > > > > Certainly... But those are laws like don't eat an ice > cream by the > > > lake. > > > Don't wear shorts on Sundays. Laws which make little or > no sense at > > > all, and > > > would fall apart in any court in the land (although why > we haven't > > > gotten > > > them off the books is beyond me). > > > > > > Mr. Clinton's sexual escapades, while by no means a > high crime, were > > > in fact > > > illegal, but that's beside my point. If he had stated that his > > > personal life > > > was his own, and he would only answer questions > pertaining to his job > > > as > > > president, I would have still disliked him, but I would > have respected > > > the > > > privacy of what he did and left it to his family and > him to sort out. > > > > > > However, when he 'LIED' to investigators, and 'LIED' > under oath, he > > > changed > > > everything! Like him, if I was caught in an adulterous > relationship, > > > chances > > > are no criminal charges would be filed against me, and > the matter > > > would be > > > between my wife and I. But if I lie under oath, and > they find out that > > > I > > > did... I'll bet you dollars to doughnuts that I go > behind bars... > > > > > > I also feel that while we are all human, the president > needs to be > > > held to a > > > higher standard. > > > > > > Marcus > > > > > > > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
