I also did not mention all the other anti-Clinton funds that were set up. 

The whole issue was sleazy. End of story.

--
Larry C. Lyons
ColdFusion/Web Developer
Certified Advanced ColdFusion 5 Developer
EBStor.com
8870 Rixlew Lane, Suite 204
Manassas, Virginia 20109-3795
tel:   (703) 393-7930
fax:   (703) 393-2659
Web:   http://www.ebstor.com
       http://www.pacel.com
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chaos, panic, and disorder - my work here is done.
--

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Corrigan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 2:58 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: How to lie your way into the White House - Bush-style
> 
> 
> What's your take on the Clinton Defense fund where they actively 
> solicited contributions to his legal defense?  Does the standard that 
> you applied to Jones and the right wingers apply to Clinton 
> and the left 
> wingers?
> 
> Michael Corrigan
> Programmer
> Endora Digital Solutions
> 1900 Highland Avenue, Suite 200
> Lombard, IL 60148
> 630-627-5055 ext.-136
> 630/627-5255 Fax
>   ----- Original Message ----- 
>   From: Larry Lyons 
>   To: CF-Community 
>   Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 1:46 PM
>   Subject: RE: How to lie your way into the White House - Bush-style
> 
> 
>   A friend of mine is on several right wing oriented mailing lists. 
> Since
>   Paula Jones was in the news he's received several mailings 
> requesting
>   donations to her fund. And this is despite the fact that she's 
> received a
>   lot of other material support from several conservative 
> groups. Simply
>   sleazy.
> 
>   larry
> 
>   --
>   Larry C. Lyons
>   ColdFusion/Web Developer
>   Certified Advanced ColdFusion 5 Developer
>   EBStor.com
>   8870 Rixlew Lane, Suite 204
>   Manassas, Virginia 20109-3795
>   tel:   (703) 393-7930
>   fax:   (703) 393-2659
>   Web:   http://www.ebstor.com
>          http://www.pacel.com
>   email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>   Chaos, panic, and disorder - my work here is done.
>   --
> 
>   > -----Original Message-----
>   > From: Russel Madere [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>   > Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 2:44 PM
>   > To: CF-Community
>   > Subject: RE: How to lie your way into the White House - Bush-style
>   > 
>   > 
>   > To paraphrase the sentiment of many here about Clinton, she's 
>   > only human.
>   > 
>   > > -----Original Message-----
>   > > From: Larry Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>   > > Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 1:37 PM
>   > > To: CF-Community
>   > > Subject: RE: How to lie your way into the White House - 
> Bush-style
>   > > 
>   > > 
>   > > And not so proud as to try and exploit the issue. 
>   > > 
>   > > larry
>   > > 
>   > > --
>   > > Larry C. Lyons
>   > > ColdFusion/Web Developer
>   > > Certified Advanced ColdFusion 5 Developer
>   > > EBStor.com
>   > > 8870 Rixlew Lane, Suite 204
>   > > Manassas, Virginia 20109-3795
>   > > tel:   (703) 393-7930
>   > > fax:   (703) 393-2659
>   > > Web:   http://www.ebstor.com
>   > >        http://www.pacel.com
>   > > email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>   > > Chaos, panic, and disorder - my work here is done.
>   > > --
>   > > 
>   > > > -----Original Message-----
>   > > > From: Russel Madere [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>   > > > Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 2:21 PM
>   > > > To: CF-Community
>   > > > Subject: RE: How to lie your way into the White House - 
> Bush-style
>   > > > 
>   > > > 
>   > > > Actually Beth, I think Michael's comment was about Paula 
>   > > > Jones, not Monica.
>   > > > 
>   > > > Paula was not proud to have been harrassed by then Gov 
>   > > > Clinton, she was
>   > > > quite hurt by it.  She never had a cum stain from him, let 
>   > > > alone keep one.
>   > > > 
>   > > > Russel
>   > > > 
>   > > > > -----Original Message-----
>   > > > > From: BethF [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>   > > > > Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 1:16 PM
>   > > > > To: CF-Community
>   > > > > Subject: Re: How to lie your way into the White House - 
>   > Bush-style
>   > > > >
>   > > > >
>   > > > > Actually, from my point of view, I think that was propaganda
>   > > > > because all the
>   > > > > evidence points to a consensual relationship.  She kept his 
>   > > > cum stains
>   > > > > because she was proud of having the relationship with him.
>   > > > >
>   > > > > --Beth, Pseudo usenet cop
>   > > > > Merlin MTB, BikeE AT, RANS gliss, Trek R200, Kickbike
>   > > > > Owned by Kavik (Samoyed Boy) and Toklat (Keeshond Boy)
>   > > > > Anchorage, Alaska
>   > > > >
>   > > > >
>   > > > >
>   > > > > ----- Original Message -----
>   > > > > From: "Michael Corrigan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>   > > > > To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>   > > > > Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 10:07 AM
>   > > > > Subject: Re: How to lie your way into the White House - 
>   > Bush-style
>   > > > >
>   > > > >
>   > > > > > Don't forget why he was being investigated.  A woman 
>   > > > accused him of
>   > > > > > sexual harassment.  The very nature of the alleged crime 
>   > > > was sexual in
>   > > > > > nature so the questions in the investigation had to 
>   > > > revolve around his
>   > > > > > sexual activity (duh).  The apologists for Clinton always 
>   > > > spin it to
>   > > > > > make it sound that he was being investigated for messing 
>   > > > around with
>   > > > > > Monica and that it was two consenting adults.  According 
>   > > > to Paula Jones,
>   > > > > > she did not consent when Clinton put the moves on her.  
>   > > > That's where it
>   > > > > > all began.  He lied in the beginning and when they 
>   > conducted their
>   > > > > > investigation found discrepancies in his testimony.  Now 
>   > > > they had to go
>   > > > > > back a revisit the issue and figure out who's telling the 
>   > > > truth, and on
>   > > > > > and on it went.  It was not about sex, it was about a 
>   > > > crime that was
>   > > > > > allegedly committed by one person on another.  You may 
>   > > > not believe Paula
>   > > > > > Jones, but I doubt one person on this list would disagree 
>   > > > that it should
>   > > > > > not have been investigated.  The investigation regarding 
>   > > > that case kept
>   > > > > > ballooning because he kept lying and getting caught in 
>   > > > the process.
>   > > > > >
>   > > > > > BTW: Not directed at you Marcus. Your e-mail just 
>   > > > happened to be the one
>   > > > > > I responded to.  This was a general response to those who 
>   > > > maintain that
>   > > > > > it was sex between two consenting adults when it wasn't.
>   > > > > >
>   > > > > > Michael Corrigan
>   > > > > > Programmer
>   > > > > > Endora Digital Solutions
>   > > > > > 1900 Highland Avenue, Suite 200
>   > > > > > Lombard, IL 60148
>   > > > > > 630-627-5055 ext.-136
>   > > > > > 630/627-5255 Fax
>   > > > > >   ----- Original Message -----
>   > > > > >   From: Marcus
>   > > > > >   To: CF-Community
>   > > > > >   Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 12:46 PM
>   > > > > >   Subject: RE: How to lie your way into the White House - 
>   > > > Bush-style
>   > > > > >
>   > > > > >
>   > > > > >   > If its a law thats antiquated and not enforced, then 
>   > > > yes it does.
>   > > > > >   >  Have you
>   > > > > >   > seen that list of ridiculous laws that circulates the 
>   > > > internet?  If
>   > > > > > I got
>   > > > > >   > arrested for one of those laws then most certainly, I 
>   > > > would say I
>   > > > > > had been
>   > > > > >   > wronged.
>   > > > > >
>   > > > > >   Certainly... But those are laws like don't eat an ice 
>   > > > cream by the
>   > > > > > lake.
>   > > > > >   Don't wear shorts on Sundays. Laws which make little or 
>   > > > no sense at
>   > > > > > all, and
>   > > > > >   would fall apart in any court in the land (although why 
>   > > > we haven't
>   > > > > > gotten
>   > > > > >   them off the books is beyond me).
>   > > > > >
>   > > > > >   Mr. Clinton's sexual escapades, while by no means a 
>   > > > high crime, were
>   > > > > > in fact
>   > > > > >   illegal, but that's beside my point. If he had 
>   > stated that his
>   > > > > > personal life
>   > > > > >   was his own, and he would only answer questions 
>   > > > pertaining to his job
>   > > > > > as
>   > > > > >   president, I would have still disliked him, but I would 
>   > > > have respected
>   > > > > > the
>   > > > > >   privacy of what he did and left it to his family and 
>   > > > him to sort out.
>   > > > > >
>   > > > > >   However, when he 'LIED' to investigators, and 'LIED' 
>   > > > under oath, he
>   > > > > > changed
>   > > > > >   everything! Like him, if I was caught in an adulterous 
>   > > > relationship,
>   > > > > > chances
>   > > > > >   are no criminal charges would be filed against me, and 
>   > > > the matter
>   > > > > > would be
>   > > > > >   between my wife and I. But if I lie under oath, and 
>   > > > they find out that
>   > > > > > I
>   > > > > >   did... I'll bet you dollars to doughnuts that I go 
>   > > > behind bars...
>   > > > > >
>   > > > > >   I also feel that while we are all human, the president 
>   > > > needs to be
>   > > > > > held to a
>   > > > > >   higher standard.
>   > > > > >
>   > > > > >   Marcus
>   > > > > >
>   > > > > >
>   > > > > >
>   > > > > 
>   > > > 
>   > > 
>   > 
>   
> 
______________________________________________________________________
Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com

Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists

Reply via email to