On 8/7/07, Chesty Puller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You're implying that the other choices are not reliable. Are they not and > what evidence do you have to prove it?
I didn't mean to imply that (but yeah, i can see where it came across as such). clarified in a previous response. > Besides the "faster development" argument, what other factors come into this > decision? I know the "out of the box" features are another argument, but 1) > what are they and 2) which ones are really that useful that it justifies > spending the money? "Useful" is, of course, a relative term. If none of the features is useful enough (on a case-by-case basis), then look at Standard (as several people in this thread have already asked... why do you need Enterprise?). the Exchange integration certainly sounds pretty useful. does that justify the cost? depends -how- useful it is to you. also, as pointed out in the thread on cf-talk... Enterprise ships with the native database drivers, some of which cost a few thousand themselves. rather than me trying to reiterate the points made in the cf-talk thread (which was 100+ posts).... http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/thread.cfm/threadid:52703 :) -- Charlie Griefer ================================================ "...All the world shall be your enemy, Prince with a Thousand Enemies, and whenever they catch you, they will kill you. But first they must catch you, digger, listener, runner, prince with a swift warning. Be cunning and full of tricks and your people shall never be destroyed." ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Download the latest ColdFusion 8 utilities including Report Builder, plug-ins for Eclipse and Dreamweaver updates. http;//www.adobe.com/cfusion/entitlement/index.cfm?e=labs%5adobecf8%5Fbeta Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:239654 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
