> GG wrote:
> (1.) There's no pu
>
Ok, you're right, there's a lot of Pu.  But,

(1.) There no public plan driven by the President that has funding
consistent with the risk.  If we're not taking action on a risk such
as this publicly, then there's no plan.  (For example, we don't allow
our wars to be fought by private industry outside of gov't control).
We need the equivalent of the moon shot on this one because we're not
just talking about solving GW - there's US security too.

(2.) What unorganized private ventures there are have been given a
half effort by the entrenched industry.  If nothing else the Prius and
the Tesla prove that.  They have kicked everyone's a55.

(3.) There's a market failure on any real change because, while the
profit incentive is massive, there are few players that could even
afford the effort and no private company that can afford the risk
failure.  We're talking 100s or billions in up front money.  If the US
can pay for Iraq, we could pay for that.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Check out the new features and enhancements in the
latest product release - download the "What's New PDF" now
http://download.macromedia.com/pub/labs/coldfusion/cf8_beta_whatsnew_052907.pdf

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:240643
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5

Reply via email to