The problem is, he's right to an extent. Once the scientific world sets a
'standard', anything against that standard is almost hitting a brick wall.
The community is against Cold Fusion (the physics idea), so no experiments
or papers on it are accepted or treated seriously. Same for ANY challenge to
evolution, no matter how scientific and non-religious it is. Look at the
fight that string theory had to go through for years before it was even
looked at by the community.
Science is based on theories that are more provable than their predecessors.
There are no facts because we don't have all of the information. It does
seem that some of those theories are being treated as facts and are being
protected from any challenge.

But I'm separating the concept of an organized force against some new ideas
from what he is saying about intelligent design.


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Create robust enterprise, web RIAs.
Upgrade to ColdFusion 8 and integrate with Adobe Flex
http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=RVJP

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:241987
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5

Reply via email to