Have you ever taken an economics course? Pay for tax cuts, that makes no sense! As for having a surplus, we should have NO SURPLUS!!! That means that the government has taken in more money than it needed to. They SHOULD give it back because its ours! If you go to the store and buy a gallon of milk for 3 bucks, wouldn't you want your change back? It's the same exact thing!! If the government spent more than it received then they should REDUCE SPENDING!! Not jack up my taxes, or any of our taxes.
No, we need to cut spending. We need to stop corporate welfare, we need to stop farm subsidies and subsidies of any kind, we need to give less money to foreign countries that hate us and to governments that are corrupt, we need to reduce the overall size of government and reevaluate many of the social programs that are wasteful. We need to get rid of politicians that are opposed to smaller government and support the idea that the government is in the best position to solve problems. Michael Corrigan Programmer Endora Digital Solutions 1900 Highland Avenue, Suite 200 Lombard, IL 60148 630-627-5055 ext.-136 630/627-5255 Fax ----- Original Message ----- From: Braver, Ben To: CF-Community Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 12:32 PM Subject: RE: Nukes Michael- perhaps you're forgetting that the "tax cuts" were supposed to be coming from a SURPLUS which isn't there, and the government had to BORROW to pay for them. So, we need more? Methinks you're the one who needs the refresher math class, sir. -Ben > -----Original Message----- > From: Michael Corrigan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 10:32 AM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: Nukes > > > As for the tax cuts...good. We need more. I'm sure I don't > need to discuss the mathematics behind the amount of money > the wealthy pay and that any percentage drop affects larger > numbers more than smaller numbers. Also, don't forget that > the wealthy pay at a much higher tax rate than the poor. I > really don't think that your "tax cut for the wealthy" stance > holds water. But it sure does sound good. > > If you're referring to his plans to allow faith based > organizations access to the same federal resources that > non-faith based organizations get, then I'm afraid that > there's nothing wrong with that. Not constitutionally anyways. > > Michael Corrigan > Programmer > Endora Digital Solutions > 1900 Highland Avenue, Suite 200 > Lombard, IL 60148 > 630-627-5055 ext.-136 > 630/627-5255 Fax > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Larry Lyons > To: CF-Community > Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 12:15 PM > Subject: RE: Nukes > > > Shall we start with the recent tax cut to the very wealthy, and the > substantial tax cut to corporations? How about his attempts > to remove the > church state barrier. I could go on and on. > > -- > Larry C. Lyons > ColdFusion/Web Developer > Certified Advanced ColdFusion 5 Developer > EBStor.com > 8870 Rixlew Lane, Suite 204 > Manassas, Virginia 20109-3795 > tel: (703) 393-7930 > fax: (703) 393-2659 > Web: http://www.ebstor.com > http://www.pacel.com > email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Chaos, panic, and disorder - my work here is done. > -- > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Michael Corrigan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 12:31 PM > > To: CF-Community > > Subject: Re: Nukes > > > > > > >I firmly believe that history will show that GW is one of > > the worst presidents in the history of the US > > > > How so? What has he done that you think is so bad? > > > > Michael Corrigan > > Programmer > > Endora Digital Solutions > > 1900 Highland Avenue, Suite 200 > > Lombard, IL 60148 > > 630-627-5055 ext.-136 > > 630/627-5255 Fax > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Howie Hamlin > > To: CF-Community > > Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 10:25 AM > > Subject: Re: Nukes > > > > > > Scary stuff. . Hopefully > > the American voters will realize this for the next election. > > > > Howie > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Haggerty, Michael A." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 11:15 AM > > Subject: Nukes > > > > > > > > > http://www.comcast.net/smedia/asiawire_2002_03_10_asian_1411-0 392-US-Nuclear > 3rdLd-Writethru..html > > Watch out for the link monster on this one... senior cabinet officials are > starting to talk about nuking terrorist countries. Somebody provided > another list of countries we don't like, and it included China this time. > > *wistful sigh* Does anyone else _really_ wish the headlines coming out of > the White House could go back to being about sex scandals instead of nuking > the third world? > > ______________________________________________________________________ Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
