Before I get flamed. Reading someone elses research results does not qualify as research into someone elses life in my book.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Russel Madere [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 3:23 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: RE: Nukes > > > I also limited that statement to contolling the Nukes. > > I don't doubt Ike could handle thing properly. I have read his biography > and much on him. I work 4 blocks from the D D Eisenhower Center > (behind the > D-Day museum). I'm just concerned that someone who has an affair > in office > is controlling nuclear weapons. Until Bush has one, I'll be less > concerned > about his judgement. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Haggerty, Michael A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 2:52 PM > > To: CF-Community > > Subject: RE: Nukes > > > > > > Uhhh... you did! Reading your post, you seemed to be saying you > > preferred a > > C student to one you considered impared. > > > > AND you stated Eisenhower's actions indicate he suffered from impared > > judgement. > > That should read ACTION, his affair in office. Beyond that, I can't point > to anything else he did that I consider questionable. I haven't done much > research into his life though. > > > > > Russel, if Eisenhower was in office, the Taleban would be > interred behind > > cash registers in 7-11's worldwide by now. The war would be over and we > > would be supressing pop-up ads for low air fares to Kabul > > starting at $99 / > > 3 night stay. Osama and his little henchmen would be on trial > in the Hague > > in the courtroom of John Wayne, Clint Eastwood, and Russell > > Crowe. We would > > not be screwing around with thoughts of nuking China or any of > this other > > weak sh*t I keep hearing out of Dubyah's abode. > > Maybe, but Ike is dead and Bush is in office. So far, Bush is doing a > pretty good job of kick Taliban tail. What I am hearing from Operation > Anaconda is impressing me. > > > > > FOR SHAME! *uncovers bran muffin of infinite despair and hurls > it towards > > you with righteous indignation* > > Alright! That can only be a better feeling than what work is driving me > too. > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Russel Madere [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 3:33 PM > > To: CF-Community > > Subject: RE: Nukes > > > > > > Who said I had a preference to him. My choice for President was John > > McCain. There has been no decent Libertarian candidate on the Louisiana > > ballot so I ended up voting Republican because I was voting > against Gore. > > > > I'm just tired of all of the Bush bashing. Bush has done an > equitable job > > on the economy after Clinton drove it into the crash and he has > > done a good > > job with the war on terrorism. I think that isn't bad for a "C > Student." > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Haggerty, Michael A. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 2:17 PM > > > To: CF-Community > > > Subject: RE: Nukes > > > > > > > > > Don't mess with Ike. > > > > > > He kicked the Wehrmacht's a**, liberated Europe, and performed > > > supreme acts > > > of moral courage in the process such that we should feel honored > > > to have had > > > him as our President. I cannot think of a single person qualified > > > to judge a > > > man like that or any of his indescretions. As they say in a > > book somewhere > > > "Let he who is without sin cast the first stone." > > > > > > Dubyah, on the other hand, has accomplished 1) managing the > > Texas Rangers > > > into the ground after buying a 1% stake in the team with his > > > Dad's money, 2) > > > governing the Great State of Texas, where he accomplished a lot > > > for big Oil > > > and death penalty advocates, and 3) being elected to high > > office only with > > > the direct intervention of the supreme court. > > > > > > I am confused about your preference towards the latter. > Please explain. > > > > > > M > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Russel Madere [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 3:01 PM > > > To: CF-Community > > > Subject: RE: Nukes > > > > > > > > > In all 3 cases you mentioned, I view the affairs as impaired > > judgement on > > > thier parts. Impaired judgement on the part of man contolling > > our nuclear > > > forces (Ike and JFK) scares me more than having a C student > controlling > > > them. > > > > > > Remember, I'm from Louisiana, the state that produced Huey P > > Long, Earl K > > > Long and Edwin W Edwards. > > > > > > Russel > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Braver, Ben [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 1:41 PM > > > > To: CF-Community > > > > Subject: RE: Nukes > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes, Russel, we have (seen their "moral" behavior). > > > > But the point was about intelligence, not moral rectitude. > > > > FDR, Eisenhower, JFK all had affairs in office. > > > > But they were intelligent. > > > > Their somewhat reprehensible private actions did not detract from > > > > that IMO. > > > > -Ben > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: Russel Madere [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 11:42 AM > > > > > To: CF-Community > > > > > Subject: RE: Nukes > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And we have seen the moral behavior of Rhodes Scholars in the > > > > > White Hose. > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > From: Braver, Ben [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > > Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 1:22 PM > > > > > > To: CF-Community > > > > > > Subject: RE: Nukes > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think he was addressing students at Yale, said he was proof a > > > > > > "C" student > > > > > > could grow up to be President. > > > > > > (Someone please correct me if I have the wrong venue, but the > > > > > > general point > > > > > > was in regards to his mediocre academic record.) > > > > > > -Ben > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > > From: Howie Hamlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > > > Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 11:22 AM > > > > > > > To: CF-Community > > > > > > > Subject: Re: Nukes > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't remember that particular comment. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Howie > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > > > From: "Braver, Ben" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 2:06 PM > > > > > > > Subject: RE: Nukes > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Howie- > > > > > > > > yes, simple-minded voters electing one of their kind. > > > > > > > > 'member his comment about mediocre students? > > > > > > > > -Ben > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
