I do admit the timing is somewhat off for just a leak, but at the same time so what. The US has always said it would do what ever it takes to secure the country. And they have always said nukes would only be used in a defensive manner.
None of this is changing, it just being reaffirmed. What it comes down to is how those plans are made and who has the decision. At 03:26 PM 3/11/2002 -0500, you wrote: >The timing and content of the leak make it look suspiciously like an >intended message to other countries. If I am wrong, I am wrong, but my >thoughts are that, given plans on engagements are highly classified and >accessible only to the most trusted resources, this leak was intentional. > >What is wrong with having plans? Nothing. I disagree that this is a plan, >however, and offer the idea that this is instead a threat to other nations. >Also, I question the insight into affairs of state of those making it. > >Have at me if you must. > >M ______________________________________________________________________ This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
