H.- y'mean private accounts like NASDAQ mutual funds or ENRON stock, so they can watch the bottom drop out and their retirement vanish like smoke? -Ben
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 9:50 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: RE: Nukes > > > Fiscally irresponsible is forcing people to deposit money into social > security instead of putting it in private accounts. > > H. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Howie Hamlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 11:39 AM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: Nukes > > > Fiscally irresponsible is giving tax refunds based on a > surplus that no > longer exists. Fiscally irresponsible is not paying down > the debt (if you consider the national debt then there really wasn't a > surplus at all to begin with). Fiscally irresponsible is > gambling with Social Security... > > Howie > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Michael Corrigan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 2:30 PM > Subject: Re: Nukes > > > > What? How is taking money out of the federal government fiscally > irresponsible? Again, that makes no sense! What IS fiscally > irresponsible is spending more money then the government > takes in! Congress > has NO fiscal discipline whatsoever! I've read reports > where up to 50 cents on the dollar is wasted and that has not > a damned thing > to do with tax cuts. And supporting lower taxes and > smaller government does not make one simple-minded. > > > > Michael Corrigan > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
