um... I was going to stay out of this till i'd had a better look at the links off that thing, but so far I see a politician's blog linking to a south african civil engineering publication that may or may not be peer reviewed. So the fact that I'm not arguing with ya by no means means that I agree.
On 12/11/07, Robert Munn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I guess you can add ALGORE to the list of people who disagree with science > for political purposes. There is mounting evidence that climate change has > nothing to do with human activity, but since that evidence doesn't mesh with > the climate change orthodoxy, it will continue to be ignored by people who > want to push global warming for their own ends. Personally, I am interested > in solutions that work. Wind power is great, I have high hopes for home > solar in certain parts of the world, hydro can be great (or horrible, see > the Three Gorges Dam in China). But all of these solutions need to be tested > in the market and allowed to succeed or fail on their own merits, not > through government subsidy. > > On Dec 11, 2007 1:16 PM, G Money wrote: > > > Then I'll lean with them, if that turns out to be the case.....what does > > NOT > > make sense, are the people who tend to disagree with the entire scientific > > community for political reasons. > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Get involved in the latest ColdFusion discussions, product development sharing, and articles on the Adobe Labs wiki. http://labs/adobe.com/wiki/index.php/ColdFusion_8 Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:248201 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
