So the pattern I am already seeing on this thread is that it is OK to teach one theory, but not another? I thought the point of educating was to present both sides of an argument? So if this is the case, then why not introduce both sides, pro and con Darwinism as well as both sides of ID? After all, it is just a theory like Evolution, right? When I was reading my daughters science book, they did have Darwin's Theory in a chapter. I read the whole chapter and it only presented the pro-Darwinism argument and offered absolutely no counter-argument. This ID document I just read actually says that they should teach Evolution, but not teach only pro-Darwinism but teach the critiques of Darwinism as well. And, they do NOT advocate forcing the teachings of ID in the classroom, but rather say that if a science teacher WANTS to teach ID, they should, but only if informed enough to teach it responsibly. So what is the problem here?
Bruce Throttle Jockey - Why golf courses should be motocross tracks Vivec wrote: > The part where they took fantasy and tried to equate it to science. > > On Jan 4, 2008 4:15 PM, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> That was interesting, what part scared you? >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:249802 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
