Bruce Sorge wrote: "why not have an elective called Religious Studies or something along those lines for students that may not believe in Evolution or that my way to hear the other side of the argument, that being Creation and not Evolution?"
Many schools have just this. And many on this list in the ID arguments have suggested that such a course is where ID as currently proposed belongs. I just have trouble understanding the Creation VERSUS Evolution fight. In my mind there is no difficulty imaging that Evolution, as we currently understand it, is a fine method for a Creator to have done his purpose. Science has absolutely nothing to say on anything outside of science. Thus nothing outside of science should be taught in a science class. I.E. here is how the natural and physical laws, mechanics and processes that we can observer interact and this interaction produces these observable, testable and repeatable results. Why or how these laws, mechanics and processes came to be is outside of science. Science just say we can observer them and we can observer the results and that is what we will study. This if from somebody who wavers between agnostic and atheist. To be honest I just personally don't get faith it does not resonate in me. But I won't muddle this point further by expanding on my personal feelings on this. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:249929 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
