In that case, 10 years isn't unusual at all to complete or continue a 
war.  You forget wars have taken 100s of years to be fully resolved before.

Dana wrote:
> yes I mean Iraq.
> 
> On Jan 30, 2008 9:26 PM, Loathe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> You mean Iraq?
>>
>> BTW, I would support an invasion of N. Korea.
>>
>> If we are going to be an interventionist country lets freaking do it.
>> Mandatory service periods for all, hardship tours of several years.
>>
>> Just too bad that the vast majority of the US are pussies.
>>
>>
>> Dana wrote:
>>> so why not invade them? I just think the bit about how we are invading
>>> Iran because they invaded Kuwait back in the day does not pass the
>>> giggle test. Why not invade Mexico for fighting with us over Texas?
>>> Heck, why not bomb Britain for being mean to us in the 18th century?
>>>
>>> On Jan 30, 2008 6:09 PM, Loathe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>> So what?
>>>>
>>>> N Korea and S Korea (and the US) are still legally at war to, so what?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Dana wrote:
>>>>> yes but that was years ago. Hell, Iraq invaded Kuwait while I was in
>>>>> Canada showing off my new baby, and he is in college now.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Jan 30, 2008 3:34 PM, Loathe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>> Also, what is this preemptive nonsense, unilateral, I'll give you, but
>>>>>> they did seriously invade Kuwait.  We never signed a peace treaty with
>>>>>> them and were still officially at war right up until we toppled their
>>>>>> government.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dinner wrote:
>>>>>>> On Jan 29, 2008 9:13 PM, Robert Munn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>>>> If you are going to argue about military action, at least address the
>>>>>>>> realities of the theater you are talking about. We could have 
>>>>>>>> pulverized
>>>>>>>> North Korea years ago, but it would have cost of the lives of 70,000+ 
>>>>>>>> US
>>>>>>>> servicemen in the Korean DMZ, maybe a million+ South Koreans in range 
>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>> North Korean artillery (e.g. all of Seoul) and perhaps even some 
>>>>>>>> Japanese
>>>>>>>> unlucky enough to be in range of North Korean missiles. No one is 
>>>>>>>> going to
>>>>>>>> make that trade for a preemptive strike, although I could see it being 
>>>>>>>> made
>>>>>>>> if the North were in the process of invading the South.
>>>>>>> Hey hey!  Look how we choose who to "premptivly attack".  =]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Iraq was the logical choice, since we didn't think we'd loose "too
>>>>>>> much", or what?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And what about Cheney's "it would be a quagmire" crap, from before the 
>>>>>>> war?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Damn man, the whole thing was just executed piss-poor.  I like seeing
>>>>>>> "bad guys" swinging from the gallows as much as the next guy, but
>>>>>>> sheesh.  These are our countrypeople dieing for these decisions!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You don't just play with life and death like that, and then say "God
>>>>>>> has my back, I don't even feel bad", and whatnot.  Or you can, but you
>>>>>>> loose my respect.  "too many funerals to make it to"... yeah...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Go buy some stuff, you Patriots.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (Not you, Rob-dawg-- the American People)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> I have found the best way to give advice to your children is to find
>>>>>>> out what they want and then advise them to do it.
>>>>>>>     Harry S Truman
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>
>>
> 
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:252725
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5

Reply via email to