You're just a genocidal Nazi man. Let it go.

Bruce Sorge wrote:
> I want to re-enforce what Robert is saying about these so called atrocities:
> 
> While I was in Iraq, we would get hit with mortars and rockets at least 
> 3-5 times a week, sometimes 2-3 times a day. For several months the 
> insurgents would fire upon us from a grove of trees, to which we would 
> respond with a barrage of artillery. We killed a lot of em that way. 
> Well, one day when I was on the FOB QRF (Quick Reaction Force), we 
> responded to a mortar attack, and when I finished my analysis, it was 
> determined that they fired at us from within the city of Tikrit where my 
> FOB was located. After arguing with our operations center officers, my 
> analysis was in fact proven to be correct. So what did we do? Did we 
> bomb the shit out of the insurgents and risk collateral damage now that 
> they started firing from within the city? NO! We did not. So the 
> insurgents discovered a safe haven to fire at us knowing that we did not 
> want to risk losing the trust that we had worked so hard to gain in this 
> city. So instead we stepped up the patrols throughout the city. Although 
> it cut back on the number of attacks, they still found ways to hit us 
> from within the city.
> 
> Another example is a friend of mine who was a Fire Direction Specialist. 
> Basically it was his job to tell the artillery where to shoot. His team 
> only trusted one artillery battery that was being run by the Marines to 
> shoot inside of the city he was in. So accurate were these guys that 
> they did not have one single incident of collateral damage and racked up 
> about 50 insurgent KIA's with artillery alone. The only structures that 
> were destroyed were the ones the insurgents were occupying.
> 
> So to the anti-war establishment on this list, don't sit there and tell 
> me or anyone else that we wantonly go out and kill whoever the hell we 
> feel like 'cause it just ain't true. We go through great pains to do the 
> best we can to avoid collateral damage. Often times at the expense of 
> our safety. And I am speaking for the majority of the military there, 
> not the few rogue warriors who feel that they can do what ever the fuck 
> they want.
> 
> And as far as the people who lose a loved one due to collateral damage, 
> the answer to that is we pay them a shit load of money for their loss. 
> Now I know that no amount of money can replace the pain and suffering of 
> losing a  loved one and I truly feel for these people, but at least we 
> recognize that this happens and we are doing what we can to lessen the 
> pain.
> 
> And on the Israel deal, I asked a lot of Iraqi's what they thought of 
> the whole thing. Of course they hate Israel just as much as the next 
> Muslim. I asked them what they think about the Palestinians, and of 
> course they feel sorry for them. So I ask them why no Arab nation is 
> helping them. They don't have an answer. Not one of them can give me an 
> answer to this very simple question. I never could figure out why, but 
> now that Robert has offered his thoughts on this, it makes perfect 
> sense. They are nothing more than a huge propaganda machine.
> 
> Bruce
> 
> Robert Munn wrote:
>> When did it become the responsibility of the Israelis to take care of the
>> people who are trying to destroy their country? The Israelis have done
>> everything but bend over backwards to help the Palestinians. Israel only cut
>> them off because they were being attacked with rockets on a daily basis. How
>> would you react? I would be tempted to hand out a serious ass-whooping via
>> air strikes on government institutions. The Israelis have shown tremendous
>> restraint in their actions.
>>
>> The rest of the Arab world, meanwhile, continues to let the Palestinians sit
>> in squalor in Gaza because they are a convenient propaganda tool against
>> Israel. The Saudis by themselves could re-build the entire economy of Gaza
>> overnight. They are awash in money. So why don't they do it? Because they
>> find it more useful for their own political ends to keep the Palestinians in
>> Gaza living in squalor, and perhaps they see no acceptable partner inside
>> Gaza at this point, because Hamas isn't interested in re-building the
>> economy either. And somehow Israel is to blame for all of this?
>>
>> As for US smart bombs killing Iraqi civilians, yeah, bad sh!t happens in
>> war, and innocent people sometimes die. But be careful throwing around the
>> word atrocity- it implies that there is a systemic campaign by US forces
>> against civilians in Iraq, and that is a ridiculous accusation to make.
>>   
> 
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to 
date
Get the Free Trial
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:252861
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5

Reply via email to