er, taxes the lower end Before someone tells me about the rebate again, yes, but this assumes that you have an address and that it doesn't chaneg and that you are not subject to some sort of back withholding, such as a defaulted student loan... cause guess what would happen then?
On Feb 3, 2008 12:10 PM, Dana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't live in SF already :) but it's a well-known gotcha that the > cost of living is higher in the locations where the work is and vice > versa. So far (granted I have not read the shiny book) it sounds a bit > glib, kind of an oversimpification. And it looks to me like it takes > the lower end disproportionately. > > On Feb 2, 2008 9:02 AM, Jerry Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > "well that's bogus then ... what about the difference in the cost of living > > between say San Francisco and east Racoon Montana?" > > > > It's bogus to have a cost of living average? By definition, the poverty > > line is basically the cost of living average. Anything below that line > > isn't enough to support yourself. Anything above that line should be > > enough. So, the poverty line is bogus I guess. > > > > I guess you would promote an index based on location. IMO, that would kill > > the fair tax as it stands since it would bring too much lobbying and bs back > > into the system. > > > > Besides, if it costs too much to live in SF, move. > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/message.cfm/messageid:253065 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Community/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
